Today is International Commonwealth Day. It lands just 5 weeks before fifty-three Heads of Governments will descend in London for the Commonwealth Summit. On the agenda? Deciding what needs to happen to establish a future Commonwealth that is “more secure”, “fairer”, “more sustainable” and “more prosperous”.
It won’t be a surprise that at Transparency International we don’t think it’s possible to truly realise those ambitions without serious efforts to curtail corruption. Why?
This Commonwealth Summit is also different to others. In a post-Brexit world the UK will be keen to establish stronger relationships with Commonwealth countries with a view to potentially striking new trade deals. If done in a rush, there’s a big chance key anti-corruption safeguards will be forgotten.
So here are just a few things Commonwealth governments could do if they genuinely wish to establish a more secure, fairer, more sustainable and more prosperous future.
Secrecy in the financial system permits the corrupt and criminal to transfer money without trail and lead to impunity for perpetrators. Commonwealth countries should agree to end the cloak of anonymity that allows corrupt individuals to launder their cash across borders. This means requiring those in control or ownership of a legal entity to disclose that information publicly in company registers. Middlemen such as the banks, lawyers and accountants need to dramatically scale up their due diligence and oversight and countries that are at risk of receiving corrupt cash through their real estate sectors (such as Commonwealth countries Canada, the UK and Australia) should ramp up their oversight to make sure they are not complicit in theft of taxpayer cash from overseas.
It’s not particularly exciting and won’t be the centrepiece of a Commonwealth street party table but providing technical and financial support to poorer Commonwealth countries, for example in their governance and legal frameworks or within their procurement and auditing systems, will help get them to a position where citizens reap benefits, the country faces a more prosperous future – and as a nation they get set up for future trading agreements. In the Ukraine, ProZorro – a multi-stakeholder initiative revolutionized procurement systems – it levelled the playing field for business by digitizing and simplifying procedures and encouraging competition for contracts. Healthcare organisations saved an average of 35% – savings that can be passed back to the taxpayer.[1]
Governments could safeguard the integrity of future trade deals by establishing high-level principles requiring that every future deal incorporates key transparency, good governance and integrity safeguards. This way there will be less danger that accountability and integrity will be pawns in the rush to fix new deals and broker new relationships.
Finally, heads of government are good at going to Summits. They’re not too bad at making lots of exciting sounding pledges. But the Commonwealth Summit has to do more than provide a celebratory platform that make leaders look good. It has to do the boring bits too – and that includes setting up monitoring and implementation mechanisms – such as establishing Anti-Corruption Strategies, or channelling commitments into their Open Government Partnership Action Plans, to turn those promises into practice when the cameras have stopped rolling.